Hoteyabi v. Vaughn
This text of 1912 OK 367 (Hoteyabi v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This case involves the consideration of the identical question decided by this court in the case of Hancock et al. v. Mutual Trust Company et al., decided July 13, 1909, and reported in 24 Okla. 391, 103 Pac. 566. The opinion in that case by Mr. Justice Dunn is conclusive as to the issue herein, and we hereby adopt and promulgate the opinion in that case as and for the opinion in this case. See, also, the recent case of J. S. Mullen et al. v. United States, 224 U. S. 448, 32 Sup. Ct. 494, 56 L. Ed. --, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States April 15, 1912, which is also conclusive as to the issues herein.
For the reason assigned, the judgment of the district court of Garvin county should be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1912 OK 367, 124 P. 63, 32 Okla. 807, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoteyabi-v-vaughn-okla-1912.