Hotel Syracuse, Inc. v. Brainard

256 A.D. 1055, 10 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 1055 (Hotel Syracuse, Inc. v. Brainard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hotel Syracuse, Inc. v. Brainard, 256 A.D. 1055, 10 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant the unpaid amount of rental agreed to be paid by defendant for the lease of certain premises in accordance with the terms of a written lease. The defendant having defaulted, judgment was entered by the clerk without application to the court. The defendant moves to vacate the judgment so entered upon the ground that the clerk did not have the right to enter the judgment but that plaintiff was required to apply to the court for judgment upon plaintiff’s default. Judgment may be taken without application to the court where the complaint sets forth a cause of action for the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the terms of the contract or capable of being ascertained therefrom by computation only. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 485.) The rent reserved in the lease was a specified annual sum to be paid in monthly installments and in addition thereto a certain percentage of the profits of defendant. These profits could not be ascertained from the lease. It would be necessary to introduce evidence to show what amount the plaintiff was entitled to receive as a share of the profits of defendant. Therefore, the clerk did not have power to enter judgment without application to the court. The judgment erroneously entered by the clerk should, therefore, be vacated. (Bouher Contracting Co. v. Neale, 161 App. Div. 617.) All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered by plaintiff against defendant, in an action to recover rentals due under a lease.) Present ■ — • Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vinny Petulla Contracting Corp. v. Ranieri
94 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.
378 N.E.2d 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Society of New York Hospital v. Tyszkiewicz
70 Misc. 2d 592 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Walters
158 So. 2d 2 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
People ex rel. Oshlag v. Skinner
1 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Davis v. Sisti
3 Misc. 2d 132 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 1055, 10 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotel-syracuse-inc-v-brainard-nyappdiv-1939.