Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas
This text of 241 A.D.2d 302 (Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered March 21, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, dismissed Action No. 2 as time-barred; and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about January 14, 1997, which denied the motion of David Berg, Esq., pro se, on behalf of himself and two other minority partners of plaintiff in Action No. 1, to set aside a global stipulation of settlement in these and related actions seeking a judicial partnership accounting from two partners, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
[303]*303The IAS Court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction to set aside the global settlement since numerous necessary parties in the related actions were not before it. Further, since a stipulation of discontinuance had been filed, the actions were terminated and the stipulation could only be set aside in a separate plenary action (see, D’Amico v Nuzzo, 194 AD2d 761). To the extent appellant and his clients seek further relief for alleged wrongs committed by other parties, they may commence a separate action or seek arbitration pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement. We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D.2d 302, 659 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotel-prince-george-affiliates-v-grimbilas-nyappdiv-1997.