Hotel Dieu Hospital v. Huerta

639 S.W.2d 462, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 475, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 334
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 21, 1982
DocketC-1118
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 639 S.W.2d 462 (Hotel Dieu Hospital v. Huerta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hotel Dieu Hospital v. Huerta, 639 S.W.2d 462, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 475, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 334 (Tex. 1982).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

This is a negligence suit. A maintenance employee of the hospital sexually assaulted Mrs. Huerta while she was hospitalized. Mrs. Huerta and her husband seek to hold the hospital liable for negligent acts and omissions related to the assault. The jury failed to find negligence in five of the six counts alleged. In the sixth count the jury found that a failure to act was negligence, but failed to find such failure was a proximate cause. The court of appeals reversed judgment on the jury verdict for the hospital and remanded the cause for new trial, holding the trial court erred in giving its sole proximate cause instruction. 636 S.W.2d 208. We agree with that holding.

As appellee in the court below and petitioner in this Court, Hotel Dieu Hospital preserved and presented by proper assignments of error the issues of whether there was any evidence to support submission of each negligence and proximate cause issue. The court of appeals did not address and did not decide these issues. These no evidence issues raised by the hospital’s crosspoint could be dispositive of this case, and the court of appeals should have ruled on them. Rule 451. 1 Since the decision of the court of appeals conflicts with Rule 451, we grant the application for writ of error and, without hearing argument, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to that court for determination of the issues presented, in accordance with this opinion. Rule 483; Baldeschwilder v. Bonham, 529 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.1975).

1

. All references to rules are to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borrego v. City of El Paso
964 S.W.2d 954 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Bel-Ton Electric Service, Inc. v. Pickle
877 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Ahlschlager v. Remington Arms Co.
750 S.W.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Taylor v. Trans-Continental Properties, Ltd.
739 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 S.W.2d 462, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 475, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotel-dieu-hospital-v-huerta-tex-1982.