Hotchkiss v. Ernst
235 U.S. 684, 35 S. Ct. 201, 59 L. Ed. 423, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 916
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Coder v. Arts, 213 U. S. 223, 234, 235; Tefft, Weller & Co. v. Munsuri, 222 U. S. 114, 118; James v. Stone & Co., 227 U. S. 410, 411; Synnott v. Mines Co., 234 U. S. 749.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hotchkiss v. Ernst, 235 U.S. 684, 35 S. Ct. 201, 59 L. Ed. 423, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 916 (1914).
235 U.S. 684 (Hotchkiss v. Ernst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coder v. Arts
213 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Tefft, Weller & Co. v. Munsuri
222 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1911)
James v. Stone & Co.
227 U.S. 410 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Synnott v. Tombstone Consolidated Mines Co.
234 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 1914)