Hotchkiss v. Ernst
235 U.S. 684, 35 S. Ct. 201, 59 L. Ed. 423, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 916
This text of 235 U.S. 684 (Hotchkiss v. Ernst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hotchkiss v. Ernst, 235 U.S. 684, 35 S. Ct. 201, 59 L. Ed. 423, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 916 (1914).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Coder v. Arts, 213 U. S. 223, 234, 235; Tefft, Weller & Co. v. Munsuri, 222 U. S. 114, 118; James v. Stone & Co., 227 U. S. 410, 411; Synnott v. Mines Co., 234 U. S. 749.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coder v. Arts
213 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Tefft, Weller & Co. v. Munsuri
222 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1911)
James v. Stone & Co.
227 U.S. 410 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Synnott v. Tombstone Consolidated Mines Co.
234 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 684, 35 S. Ct. 201, 59 L. Ed. 423, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotchkiss-v-ernst-scotus-1914.