Hotchkiss v. Chevaillier
This text of 12 Tex. 224 (Hotchkiss v. Chevaillier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that the Court did not err in giving judgment for the defendant in the certiorari, for the amount remaining due upon the Justice’s judgment. Having obtained cognizance of the case, it was proper for the Court to adjudicate upon the rights of the parties, and to carry its judgment into execution, without remanding the case to the Justice for that purpose. And to enable the Court to award execution, it was necessary to render judgment for the debt.
But in awarding costs, the judgment does not conform to the statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 716.1 The judgment must therefore he reversed, and such judgment be here rendered as the District Court should have rendered.
Reversed and re-formed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Tex. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotchkiss-v-chevaillier-tex-1854.