Hotaling v. Corning Inc.

12 A.D.3d 1066, 784 N.Y.S.2d 464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hotaling v. Corning Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 A.D.3d 1064
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2004·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered August 7, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hotaling v. Corning Inc., 12 A.D.3d 1066, 784 N.Y.S.2d 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 1066 (Hotaling v. Corning Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.
155 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)