HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M.
This text of HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M. (HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
532 CA 12-01221 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
RICHARD HOTALING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
CHARLES M. SPROCK, ESQ., ROBERT F. BALDWIN, JR., ESQ., JAMIE L. SUTPHEN, ESQ. AND BALDWIN & SUTPHEN, LLP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (NICOLE MARLOW-JONES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (LAURENCE F. SOVIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered September 15, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the third amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
HOTALING, RICHARD v. SPROCK, ESQ., CHARLES M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotaling-richard-v-sprock-esq-charles-m-nyappdiv-2013.