Hostetter v. CITY OF HERMANN

333 S.W.3d 538, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 351, 2011 WL 900371
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
DocketED 94631
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 333 S.W.3d 538 (Hostetter v. CITY OF HERMANN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hostetter v. CITY OF HERMANN, 333 S.W.3d 538, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 351, 2011 WL 900371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Krista E. Hostetter, appeals from the grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment on her action alleging her personal property was wrongfully destroyed. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Adams
333 S.W.3d 538 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 S.W.3d 538, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 351, 2011 WL 900371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hostetter-v-city-of-hermann-moctapp-2011.