Hostetter & Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
11 A. 609, 8 Sadler 499, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 785
Opinion
The exceptions in this case are confined to the charge of the court. After examining that charge with the shipping bill, we are constrained to say that the assignments of error cannot be sustained. The charge contains a sound and clear exposition of the law governing the controversy; and as our comments can add nothing to its value we abstain from a useless labor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hostetter & Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 11 A. 609, 8 Sadler 499, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 785 (Pa. 1887).
11 A. 609 (Hostetter & Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Post v. Railroad
55 L.R.A. 481 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1899)
Keller v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
10 Pa. Super. 240 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. Cameron
66 F. 709 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)