Hostetler v. National Acceptance Co.

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 419
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 1930·No. No 98·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

PARDEE, J.

FUNK, PJ. and WASHBURN, J„ concur.

SYLLABUS

The holder of a chattel mortgage upon an automobile who permits the mortgagor, a retail automobile dealer, to place said automobile upon its salesroom floor for the purpose of sale to one who might be attracted ■thereby, will not be permitted to assert its mortgage against an innocent purchaser, who bought the car from said dealer in the ordinary retail way for value and without actual notice of such mortgage.

Fufi opinion will be published later. Watch Omnibus Index.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hostetler v. National Acceptance Co., 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 419 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 419 (Hostetler v. National Acceptance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Ferguson
191 N.E. 834 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1933)