Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Hoste v. CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH

Hoste v. CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH

698 N.W.2d 400, 472 Mich. 943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoste v. CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1064 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 2005·No. 127200·Published

Opinion

698 N.W.2d 400 (2005)
472 Mich. 899-924

HOSTE
v.
CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH

No. 127200.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 30, 2005.

SC: 127200, COA: 245804.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and it is DENIED. The Antrim Circuit Court correctly analyzed this case and properly determined that Defendant Reliable Racing Supply could not be held liable because it had no knowledge or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoste v. CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH, 698 N.W.2d 400, 472 Mich. 943 (Mich. 2005).

698 N.W.2d 400 (Hoste v. CHRYSLER CORP. PLYMOUTH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.