Hossein S. Namdarkhan A/K/A Shawn Namdar v. Morrison Supply Company L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2010·No. 02-10-00215-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00215-CV

HOSSEIN S. NAMDARKHAN A/K/A APPELLANT SHAWN NAMDAR

V.

MORRISON SUPPLY COMPANY APPELLEE L.L.C.

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered “Appellant's Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”

It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 7, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hossein S. Namdarkhan A/K/A Shawn Namdar v. Morrison Supply Company L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Hossein S. Namdarkhan A/K/A Shawn Namdar v. Morrison Supply Company L.L.C. (Hossein S. Namdarkhan A/K/A Shawn Namdar v. Morrison Supply Company L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.