Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Insurance Commissioner

85 A.3d 479, 624 Pa. 306, 2014 WL 561984, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 408
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 12, 2014·No. No. 681 MAL 2013·Published

Opinion

[307]*307 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of February 2014 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court err by concluding that 40 P.S. § 1303.712(d) requires the Commission to “spend down” any balance in the MCARE Fund in calculating annual provider assessments when the Court’s opinion disregards the plain language and purpose of the statute, disregards accepted statutory construction principles and conflicts with the court’s decision in Meier v. Maleski, 670 A.2d 755 (Pa. Cmwlth.1996), aff'd without op., 549 Pa. 171, 700 A.2d 1262 (1997)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Insurance Commissioner, 85 A.3d 479, 624 Pa. 306, 2014 WL 561984, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 408 (Pa. 2014).

85 A.3d 479 (Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Insurance Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meier v. Maleski
670 A.2d 755 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)