Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Countrywide Insurance

10 A.D.3d 628, 783 N.Y.S.2d 587, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10758

This text of 10 A.D.3d 628 (Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Countrywide Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Countrywide Insurance, 10 A.D.3d 628, 783 N.Y.S.2d 587, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[629]*629In an action to recover no-fault medical payments, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated October 1, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs submitted evidentiary proof that the defendant insurance company had not responded to their February 19, 2003, and January 15, 2003, claims for no-fault medical benefits within 30 days as required by Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and 11 NYCRR 65.15 (g) (3). In opposition to the motion, the defendant submitted documentary evidence and an affidavit of an employee asserting that the same claims had originally been billed over one year earlier and that timely denial of claim forms had been mailed to the plaintiffs at that time.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs satisfied their burden of establishing a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). However, the defendant submitted admissible evidence in opposition to the motion, which raised triable issues of fact as to the dates on which the plaintiffs mailed the no-fault claims to the defendant (see New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 295 AD2d 583, 585 [2002]) and whether the defendant properly denied those claims (see Hospital for Joint Diseases v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 284 AD2d 374, 375 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the motion for summary judgment. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
284 A.D.2d 374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. Country-Wide Insurance
295 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.3d 628, 783 N.Y.S.2d 587, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hospital-for-joint-diseases-v-countrywide-insurance-nyappdiv-2004.