Hoskins v. Wainwright

263 So. 2d 204, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3592
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1972
DocketNo. 41995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 So. 2d 204 (Hoskins v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoskins v. Wainwright, 263 So. 2d 204, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3592 (Fla. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The writ of habeas corpus herein was granted and a return required on the sole issue of whether or not the trial court determined the voluntariness of petitioner’s confession prior to its introduction into evidence at trial. On consideration of the return, we conclude that the District Court of Appeal correctly decided in Hoskins v. State, 208 So.2d 145 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1968), that this determination was properly made. In the course of disposing of petitioner’s Motion to Suppress, the trial court would have had to consider this issue.

The writ heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanding v. State
446 So. 2d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 2d 204, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoskins-v-wainwright-fla-1972.