Hoskins v. United States Congress
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David A. Hoskins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoskins v. United States Cong., No. 5:11-ct-03186-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2012). We further deny Hoskins’ motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
474 F. App'x 288 (Hoskins v. United States Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.