Hoskins v. State

555 So. 2d 1324, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 585, 1990 WL 7519
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1990
DocketNo. 87-02568
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 555 So. 2d 1324 (Hoskins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoskins v. State, 555 So. 2d 1324, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 585, 1990 WL 7519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and find no error in the judge’s instructions to the jury. The appellant contends that he was sentenced for the crime alleged in Count II notwithstanding that it was abandoned by the state. The sentencing error has been corrected. The record reflects an amended sentence in case number CJ85-4021, in which the defendant was committed to five years in state prison for the crime alleged in Count I. Immediately thereafter appears a notice of nolle prose-qui terminating and dismissing Count II. Therefore, we need take no corrective action.

Affirmed.

PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heldmyer v. Heldmyer
555 So. 2d 1324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 1324, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 585, 1990 WL 7519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoskins-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.