Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hoskins v. City of Miami

Hoskins v. City of Miami

766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10327, 2000 WL 1153298
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 16, 2000
DocketNo. 3D00-279
StatusPublished

This text of 766 So. 2d 410 (Hoskins v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoskins v. City of Miami, 766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10327, 2000 WL 1153298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mandamus is not the proper remedy for redress of Appellant Derik Hoskins’ complaints. See Davis v. City of South Bay, 433 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. City of South Bay
433 So. 2d 1364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10327, 2000 WL 1153298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoskins-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-2000.