Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hoskins v. City of Miami

Hoskins v. City of Miami

766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10327, 2000 WL 1153298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2000·No. No. 3D00-279·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mandamus is not the proper remedy for redress of Appellant Derik Hoskins’ complaints. See Davis v. City of South Bay, 433 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoskins v. City of Miami, 766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10327, 2000 WL 1153298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 410 (Hoskins v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. City of South Bay
433 So. 2d 1364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)