Hoskins v. Byler

14 S.W. 864, 53 Ark. 532, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 133
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 22, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

One who acquires possession of lands ftom another, whether as agent or tenant, cannot withhold the possession, and, in an action of ejectment against him, put the plaintiff to proof of his title. The agreed statement of .facts shows that the appellee entered upon the lands as agent of the appellant; he is not entitled to hold against him, even though he may have no title.

Reverse and remand the cause, with instructions to render judgment for plaintiff for possession of the lands and ,$148.53 damages for detention thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoskins v. Byler, 14 S.W. 864, 53 Ark. 532, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 133 (Ark. 1890).

14 S.W. 864 (Hoskins v. Byler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. Moore
105 S.W. 253 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Schmidt v. Musson
107 N.W. 367 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)
Kelly v. Oregon Short Line Railway
38 P. 404 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1894)