Hoskins v. Bigham

1 White & W. 575
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedMarch 9, 1881
DocketNo. 1274, Op. Book No. 2, p. 249
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 575 (Hoskins v. Bigham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoskins v. Bigham, 1 White & W. 575 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1027. Forcible detainer; tenant cannot dispute title of landlord. A tenant who had leased premises, having at the time of the lease a claim of his own thereto, was not allowed in an action of forcible detainer, brought [576]*576against him by his landlord after the expiration of the term of renting, to set up his claim to the premises in bar of the landlord’s action. A tenant cannot dispute the title of his landlord under which he entered and took possession, and especially is this true where the matter sought to be made available by the tenant for this purpose existed and was known to the parties prior to the leasing. Of course there are exceptions to this rule, as well recognized as the rule itself, but this case did not fall within any of these exceptions.

March 9, 1881.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoskins-v-bigham-texcommnapp-1881.