Hoskin v. Fahey

Fourth Circuit

Hoskin v. Fahey

110 F. App'x 361

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2004·No. No. 04-7144·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Danny Hoskin appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 7, 2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Danny Hoskin appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 7, 2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hoskin v. Fahey, 110 F. App'x 361 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 361 (Hoskin v. Fahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related