Hosford v. Hartford Fire Insurance

127 U.S. 404, 8 S. Ct. 1202, 32 L. Ed. 198, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2003
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 14, 1888·No. 264·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gray,

after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case, I am instructed by the majority of the court to announce its opinion that the warranty concerning incumbrances includes only incumbrances created by the act or with íhe consent of the assured, and not those created by the law; and therefore the policy was not avoided by the omission to disclose the fact that “ delinquent taxes ” on the premises for previous years were due and unpaid, although by the statutes of Nebraska taxes are made a lien on the real estate taxed.

Judgment reversed, and case remanded to the Circuit Cov/rt, with directions to render judgment for the plaintiffs upon the special verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosford v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 127 U.S. 404, 8 S. Ct. 1202, 32 L. Ed. 198, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2003 (1888).

127 U.S. 404 (Hosford v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pusey's Estate
149 A. 479 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Day v. Hustisford Farmers Mutual Insurance
212 N.W. 301 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)
Kline Bros. v. Royal Ins. Co.
192 F. 378 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1911)
Kennedy v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance
122 N.W. 134 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Fouts v. Millikan
65 N.E. 1050 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Phenix Insurance v. Smith
61 P. 501 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1900)
Lodge v. Capital Insurance
58 N.W. 1089 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)
Small v. Westchester Fire Ins.
51 F. 789 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1892)