Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2007·No. 06-1712·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1712

WILBERT O. HOSEY,

Petitioner,

versus

VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (05-1007-BLA)

Submitted: November 20, 2006 Decided: January 10, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert O. Hosey, Petitioner Pro Se. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wilbert O. Hosey seeks review of the Benefits Review

Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s

denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945

(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the Board. Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co., No. 05-1007-BLA (BRB May

25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co, (4th Cir. 2007).

Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co (Hosey v. Valley Camp Coal Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901