Hosea v. McGuire
This text of 33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 422 (Hosea v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The phrase “and by such excavation” as used in Sec. 2676 R. S., (Sec. 3782 G. C.) means one to a greater depth than nine feet below the curb of the street; and the damage for which this owner is liable is only that which is caused by such greater depth and not that which may be caused by the whole excavation.
This is made plain by Sec. 2677 R. S. (See. 3783 G. C.), which expressly allows an excavation to the full depth of nine feet without reference to the depth of adjoining foundation walls and without incurring liability.
The construction contended for by counsel for plaintiff in error would make the defendant in error liable for that which the statute allows as well as that which it forbids.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Ohio C.C. Dec. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hosea-v-mcguire-ohcircthamilton-1908.