Hosea v. Langley

Eleventh Circuit

Hosea v. Langley

226 F. App'x 863

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 2007

DocketNo. 06-11784

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 F. App'x 863 (Hosea v. Langley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hosea v. Langley, 226 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of that court’s painstakingly thorough and well-reasoned order of February 7, 2006. All of the arguments that the appellants have raised before us are adequately answered in the district court’s order and no purpose would be served by repeating here what is said there.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the state law claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of that court’s painstakingly thorough and well-reasoned order of February 7, 2006. All of the arguments that the appellants have raised before us are adequately answered in the district court’s order and no purpose would be served by repeating here what is said there.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the state law claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hosea-v-langley-ca11-2007.