Hosea v. Langley

Eleventh Circuit

Hosea v. Langley

226 F. App'x 863

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 2, 2007·No. No. 06-11784·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of that court’s painstakingly thorough and well-reasoned order of February 7, 2006. All of the arguments that the appellants have raised before us are adequately answered in the district court’s order and no purpose would be served by repeating here what is said there.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the state law claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of that court’s painstakingly thorough and well-reasoned order of February 7, 2006. All of the arguments that the appellants have raised before us are adequately answered in the district court’s order and no purpose would be served by repeating here what is said there.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the state law claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

Hosea v. Langley, 226 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

226 F. App'x 863 (Hosea v. Langley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.