Hosch v. Hosch
This text of 361 S.E.2d 686 (Hosch v. Hosch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant brings this direct appeal from a judgment denying his [371]*371petition to hold appellee in contempt of the final judgment and decree of divorce between the parties which granted him visitation rights to the parties’ child. As visitation privileges are a part of custody, Buckner v. Davis, 175 Ga. App. 849 (335 SE2d 745) (1985), this case can be reviewed only by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Appellant’s failure to follow the procedure necessary to secure a discretionary appeal requires dismissal of this case. Burnett v. Coleman, 170 Ga. App. 394 (317 SE2d 546) (1984), and cits.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 S.E.2d 686, 184 Ga. App. 370, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hosch-v-hosch-gactapp-1987.