Hosch v. Hosch

361 S.E.2d 686, 184 Ga. App. 370, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2258
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1987·No. 75517·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Appellant brings this direct appeal from a judgment denying his [371]*371petition to hold appellee in contempt of the final judgment and decree of divorce between the parties which granted him visitation rights to the parties’ child. As visitation privileges are a part of custody, Buckner v. Davis, 175 Ga. App. 849 (335 SE2d 745) (1985), this case can be reviewed only by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Appellant’s failure to follow the procedure necessary to secure a discretionary appeal requires dismissal of this case. Burnett v. Coleman, 170 Ga. App. 394 (317 SE2d 546) (1984), and cits.

Decided September 15, 1987 Rehearing denied September 29, 1987 Roy Lee Hosch, pro se. Lanier Randall, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Birdsong, C. J., and Deen, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosch v. Hosch, 361 S.E.2d 686, 184 Ga. App. 370, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2258 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

361 S.E.2d 686 (Hosch v. Hosch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wieland v. Wieland
414 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)