Hosbach v. Hosbach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hosbach v. Hosbach

637 So. 2d 393, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5883, 1994 WL 261400

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1994·No. No. 93-2300·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment entered against appellant in all respects except one. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred by including the following language in its judgment: “AND FURTHER that the above-portion of this Judgment be designated as an award of alimony.” Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with direction that the above language be stricken from the judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment entered against appellant in all respects except one. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred by including the following language in its judgment: “AND FURTHER that the above-portion of this Judgment be designated as an award of alimony.” Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with direction that the above language be stricken from the judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Hosbach v. Hosbach, 637 So. 2d 393, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5883, 1994 WL 261400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

637 So. 2d 393 (Hosbach v. Hosbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.