Hosannah v. Maimonides Medical Center
This text of 214 A.D.2d 605 (Hosannah v. Maimonides Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant David Dragutsky appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated June 4, 1993, which denied his motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. There are questions of fact regarding the appellant’s role and responsibilities in providing for the infant plaintiffs care which preclude the grant of summary judgment (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D.2d 605, 624 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hosannah-v-maimonides-medical-center-nyappdiv-1995.