Hosack v. Smiley
390 U.S. 744, 20 L. Ed. 2d 275, 88 S. Ct. 1442, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1817
Opinion
HOSACK ET AL.
v.
SMILEY ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Melvin L. Wulf for appellants.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John P. Holloway, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hosack v. Smiley, 390 U.S. 744, 20 L. Ed. 2d 275, 88 S. Ct. 1442, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1817 (1968).
390 U.S. 744 (Hosack v. Smiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. Wadmond
401 U.S. 154 (Supreme Court, 1971)