Horwitz v. North British & Mercantile Insurance
This text of 150 N.Y.S. 375 (Horwitz v. North British & Mercantile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action upon a policy of fire insurance to recover the value of merchandise alleged to have been destroyed. After issue had been joined, upon defendant’s motion, the plaintiff was ordered to serve a bill of particulars. He appeals from so much of the order as requires him to state the items of property claimed to have been destroyed, the time when and place where purchased, the price paid therefor, and the value of the same at the time of the fire.
[376]*376It is no hardship upon the plaintiff to require him to give the defendant the information asked, if he can do so. If he cannot give him all the information, then he should give as much as he can, and state why he cannot give the remainder.
The order appealed from, therefore, is modified, by requiring the plaintiff to give the defendant the information, or so much of it as he can, as above indicated, and, if he cannot give all of it, then give the reason why he cannot do so. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs to either party. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 N.Y.S. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horwitz-v-north-british-mercantile-insurance-nyappdiv-1914.