Horwitz v. Diamond
This text of 161 Misc. 665 (Horwitz v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The reasonable expense incurred by the accommodation indorser in consequence of the maker’s default, including counsel fees and disbursements, may be recovered from the maker. (Thompson v. Taylor, 72 N. Y. 32.) The counsel fee of $250 was admitted by defendant’s attorney to be reasonable if the maker was liable in the circumstance. The additional items consisting of cablegrams, telephones, typewriting, photostats, process servers’ fees, postage and miscellaneous were not proven in the amounts claimed. I think $100 would reasonably cover these items. Judgment for plaintiff for $350, with appropriate interest. Defendant is allowed a stay of ten days and thirty days to make a case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 Misc. 665, 293 N.Y.S. 231, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horwitz-v-diamond-nynyccityct-1937.