Horvath v. Weissman
271 A.D.2d 776
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 1946
StatusPublished
This text of 271 A.D.2d 776 (Horvath v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Horvath v. Weissman, 271 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion upon the ground that the third separate defense and counterclaim sufficiently sets forth a common-law action for fraud and deceit. [See post, p. 864.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horvath-v-weissman-nyappdiv-1946.