Horvath v. Southwest Airlines Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Horvath v. Southwest Airlines Co.

761 So. 2d 1250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8952, 2000 WL 966298

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2000·No. No. 1D99-2484·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The cause before us arises from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (Commission) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits to Claimant. We find that, under the authority of Hardy v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1402, 2000 WL 718195, — So.2d - (Fla. 1st DCA June 6, 2000), and Shu v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 710 So.2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the referee erred in interpreting section 443.101(l)(e), Florida Statutes. We therefore REVERSE the Commis-

sion’s order and REMAND for a determination of Claimant’s eligibility for benefits pursuant to section 443.091(l)(c)l., Florida Statutes.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The cause before us arises from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (Commission) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits to Claimant. We find that, under the authority of Hardy v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1402, 2000 WL 718195, — So.2d - (Fla. 1st DCA June 6, 2000), and Shu v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 710 So.2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the referee erred in interpreting section 443.101(l)(e), Florida Statutes. We therefore REVERSE the Commis-

sion’s order and REMAND for a determination of Claimant’s eligibility for benefits pursuant to section 443.091(l)(c)l., Florida Statutes.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Horvath v. Southwest Airlines Co., 761 So. 2d 1250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8952, 2000 WL 966298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

761 So. 2d 1250 (Horvath v. Southwest Airlines Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related