Horvath v. Patterson
3 A.D.2d 730, 160 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6402
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1957·Published
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the suspension of petitioners-respondents, employees of the New York City Transit Authority, and for other relief, the Authority appeals by permission (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1304) from so much of an order as denies its cross motion to dismiss the petition for 'insufficiency. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [3 Misc 2d 960.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horvath v. Patterson, 3 A.D.2d 730, 160 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
3 A.D.2d 730 (Horvath v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horvath v. Patterson
3 Misc. 2d 960 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)