Horvath v. Patterson
This text of 3 A.D.2d 730 (Horvath v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the suspension of petitioners-respondents, employees of the New York City Transit Authority, and for other relief, the Authority appeals by permission (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1304) from so much of an order as denies its cross motion to dismiss the petition for 'insufficiency. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [3 Misc 2d 960.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 730, 160 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horvath-v-patterson-nyappdiv-1957.