Horvath v. Niacet Corp.
This text of 115 A.D.2d 262 (Horvath v. Niacet Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion granted. Memorandum: The court erred in refusing to grant plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on his claim under Labor Law § 240. The duty imposed on the owner under that section is not satisfied by proof that a safety belt and line were available at the bottom of a gang box at the jobsite and that plaintiff could have used it (Heath v Soloff Constr., 107 AD2d 507). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 262, 495 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horvath-v-niacet-corp-nyappdiv-1985.