Horvath (Tamas) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TAMAS HORVATH, No. 80237 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILID

Respondent. MAR

I

- COURT „e,

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CI

This is a pro se appeal from "the Judgment/Order entered on the 13 day of November, 2019." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kenneth C. Cory, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to correct clerical error in judgment. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). In addition, it does not appear that appellant was aggrieved by the "Order for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Prosequendum/To Return Prisoner Back to Federal Custody" entered on January 16, 2020. See NRS 177.015. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

ArkstGuki J. ki.,1440)

Stiglich Silver

SUPRBAE COM OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 414ZAST, zo- o sz 23

.• .3.4 4

cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Tarnas Horvath Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Anthony L. Abbatangelo