Horton's Appeal

38 Pa. 294, 1861 Pa. LEXIS 111
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 Pa. 294 (Horton's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton's Appeal, 38 Pa. 294, 1861 Pa. LEXIS 111 (Pa. 1861).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Woodward, J.

— Whether Mrs. Simpson was imposed upon and entrapped into signing a receipt in full for one hundred and fifty-five dollars, when two hundred and eight dollars and eighty-eight cents were really due to her, was a question of fact inquired into and decided by a very competent auditor, and as the court below saw no reason for reversing his finding, so we s.ee none. A receipt is always open to explanation. And this one, given by a widow to an executor, “ on compromise in full of all claims and demands against the estate,” was a peculiarly fit subject of scrutiny. Whether upon the evidence we should have attained the same conclusions the auditor did, is not the question before us, but as we see no adequate reason for reversing his conclusions, the decree is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Kaminski
606 A.2d 948 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Wilson's Estate
59 Pa. Super. 358 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Estate of Eshelman
21 A. 905 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Pa. 294, 1861 Pa. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hortons-appeal-pa-1861.