Horton v. West
This text of 448 F. App'x 325 (Horton v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Willie Horton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v. West, No. 1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA, 2011 WL 124602 (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2011). We deny Horton’s pending motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [326]*326in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F. App'x 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-west-ca4-2011.