Horton v. West

Fourth Circuit

Horton v. West

448 F. App'x 325

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2011·No. No. 11-6537·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Horton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v. West, No. 1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA, 2011 WL 124602 (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2011). We deny Horton’s pending motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [326]*326in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Horton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v. West, No. 1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA, 2011 WL 124602 (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2011). We deny Horton’s pending motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [326]*326in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Horton v. West, 448 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

448 F. App'x 325 (Horton v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related