Horton v. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Missouri Court of Appeals

Horton v. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

341 S.W.3d 131, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 590, 2011 WL 1532051

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 2011·No. ED 95818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Harry Horton, appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him compensation for a shoulder injury he alleges he suffered in the course of his employment with Veolia Environmental Services.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *132 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the Commission’s award denying compensation. 1 Rule 84.16(b)(4).

1

. All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Harry Horton, appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him compensation for a shoulder injury he alleges he suffered in the course of his employment with Veolia Environmental Services.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *132 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the Commission’s award denying compensation. 1 Rule 84.16(b)(4).

1

. All pending motions are denied.

Horton v. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, 341 S.W.3d 131, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 590, 2011 WL 1532051 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

341 S.W.3d 131 (Horton v. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related