Horton v. Union Store

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Horton v. Union Store

91 S.E. 214, 19 Ga. App. 184, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 51

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 23, 1917

Docket7598

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 214 (Horton v. Union Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horton v. Union Store, 91 S.E. 214, 19 Ga. App. 184, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 51 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. Where a tenant sublets land without the landlord’s permission, the landlord is entitled to make his rent out of the crop grown on the land by the subtenant, on a distress warrant issued against the principal tenant. Civil Code, § 3340; Alston v. Wilson, 64 Ga. 482; Andrew v. Stewart, 81 Ga. 53 (7 S. E. 169) ; Thompson v. Commercial Guano Co., 93 Ga. 282 (20 S. E. 309) ; Hudson v. Stewart, 110 Ga. 37, 40, 41 (35 S. E. 178); Leonard v. Fields, 143 Ga. 479, 481 (85 S. E. 315) ; Long v. Clark, 16 Ga. App. 355 (85 S. E. 358).

2. Under the ruling of the authorities cited in the preceding headnote and the agreed statement of facts in the instant case, the court, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury, did not err in rendering judgment in favor of -the plaintiff in the distress warrant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

1. Where a tenant sublets land without the landlord’s permission, the landlord is entitled to make his rent out of the crop grown on the land by the subtenant, on a distress warrant issued against the principal tenant. Civil Code, § 3340; Alston v. Wilson, 64 Ga. 482; Andrew v. Stewart, 81 Ga. 53 (7 S. E. 169) ; Thompson v. Commercial Guano Co., 93 Ga. 282 (20 S. E. 309) ; Hudson v. Stewart, 110 Ga. 37, 40, 41 (35 S. E. 178); Leonard v. Fields, 143 Ga. 479, 481 (85 S. E. 315) ; Long v. Clark, 16 Ga. App. 355 (85 S. E. 358).

2. Under the ruling of the authorities cited in the preceding headnote and the agreed statement of facts in the instant case, the court, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury, did not err in rendering judgment in favor of -the plaintiff in the distress warrant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 214, 19 Ga. App. 184, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-union-store-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack