Horton v. Thomas McNally Co.

174 A.D. 918, 160 N.Y.S. 1127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. Thomas McNally Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D. 248

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and [919]*919disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. Thomas McNally Co., 174 A.D. 918, 160 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

174 A.D. 918 (Horton v. Thomas McNally Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.