Horton v. State

165 S.W.2d 739, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 622
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 11, 1942
DocketNo. 22272
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 165 S.W.2d 739 (Horton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton v. State, 165 S.W.2d 739, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 622 (Tex. 1942).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of cattle. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The i-ecord is before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment seems to be in due form; hence there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

French v. Brodsky
521 S.W.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 S.W.2d 739, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.