Horton v. State

170 S.W. 785, 75 Tex. Crim. 228, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Tex. Crim. 89
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 11, 1914·No. No. 3329.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, from which judgment of conviction he prosecutes this appeal.

However, in the record there are no bills of exception and no statement of facts accompanies the record. Under such circumstances, as the indictment charges the offense of which he was convicted, there is nothing presented for review. There are questions presented in the motion for new trial, which would indicate that appellant’s defense was that he had purchased the pistol and was carrying it home, which issue the court did not present to the jury. But without the evidence heard on the trial, we can not say that the court erred in not doing so.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. State, 170 S.W. 785, 75 Tex. Crim. 228, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 459 (Tex. 1914).

170 S.W. 785 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.