Horton v. State

1910 OK CR 106, 109 P. 1115, 3 Okla. Crim. 735, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 23, 1910
DocketNo. A-245.
StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 106 (Horton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton v. State, 1910 OK CR 106, 109 P. 1115, 3 Okla. Crim. 735, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PEE CHBIAM.

In March, 1910, the state filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the reason that no notice of appeal was served and filed as required by se'etion 6949 of Snyder’s Compiled Laws of Oklahoma. The record shows the service of such notice upon the county attorney; but there is nothing in the record before us to show the service of such notice upon the county judge or the clerk of the county court. Wherefore the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained. It is therefore ordered that the purported appeal herein be and the same is hereby dismissed, and that this cause be remanded to the county court of Lincoln county, with directions to enforce its judgment and sentence herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1910 OK CR 106, 109 P. 1115, 3 Okla. Crim. 735, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.