Horton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Horton v. State

391 S.W.3d 499, 2013 WL 324267, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 123

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 125 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75044·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael E. Horton appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael E. Horton appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Horton v. State, 391 S.W.3d 499, 2013 WL 324267, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 499 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.