Horton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Horton v. State

214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2007 WL 447087

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2007·No. No. ED 86119·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Le’Mon Horton, appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Le’Mon Horton, appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Horton v. State, 214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, 2007 WL 447087 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

214 S.W.3d 351 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.