Horton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Horton v. State

196 S.E. 241, 57 Ga. App. 525, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 327

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 17, 1938·No. 26581·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of Code, §§ 26-7408, 26-7409, commonly called the “labor-contract law.” After a careful reading of the brief of evidence, and of the decisions of this court and the Supreme Court construing the above sections, we are of the opinion that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, - and therefore that the trial judge erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of Code, §§ 26-7408, 26-7409, commonly called the “labor-contract law.” After a careful reading of the brief of evidence, and of the decisions of this court and the Supreme Court construing the above sections, we are of the opinion that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, - and therefore that the trial judge erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Horton v. State, 196 S.E. 241, 57 Ga. App. 525, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 327 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

196 S.E. 241 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.