Horton v. State

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 610, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 641
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 1925
Docket16268
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 302 (Horton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horton v. State, 127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 610, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 641 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial being based only on the usual general grounds, and there being ample evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be »

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 610, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-state-gactapp-1925.