Horton v. State
60 Ala. 72
Opinion
The indictment is insufficient in each count. In the first count, the building burned, or to which fire was set, is described as a barn or stable; in the second, as a barn, house, or building; in the third, as a barn or stable. We have no statute which authorizes such disjunctive averments, and it is plain the common law does not tolerate them. — Norton v. State, 53 Ala. 488.
The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded ; but the prisoner will remain in custody, until discharged by due course of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horton v. State, 60 Ala. 72 (Ala. 1877).
60 Ala. 72 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. State
68 So. 357 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)