Horton v. State

60 Ala. 72
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKELL, C. J.

The indictment is insufficient in each count. In the first count, the building burned, or to which fire was set, is described as a barn or stable; in the second, as a barn, house, or building; in the third, as a barn or stable. We have no statute which authorizes such disjunctive averments, and it is plain the common law does not tolerate them. — Norton v. State, 53 Ala. 488.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded ; but the prisoner will remain in custody, until discharged by due course of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. State, 60 Ala. 72 (Ala. 1877).

60 Ala. 72 (Horton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
68 So. 357 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)